时序知识图谱构建研究综述

doi:10.3778/j.issn.1673-9418.2406089

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 知识图谱作为连接数据、知识和智能的桥梁，已被广泛应用于辅助搜索、智能推荐、问答系统、自然语言处理等多个领域。然而，随着应用场景的不断拓展，传统静态知识图谱逐渐暴露出在处理动态知识方面的局限性。时序知识图谱的出现弥补了这一缺陷，它将时间信息融入图谱结构，能够更准确地表示知识的动态变化。对时序知识图谱的构建进行了全面的研究，介绍了时序知识图谱的概念，明确了其在处理动态知识时的价值。解析了时序知识图谱构建流程，将其核心过程划分为知识抽取、知识融合和知识计算三大环节。对每个阶段进行了梳理，明确了任务定义，总结了研究现状，并探讨了大语言模型在这些任务中的应用。在知识抽取阶段，重点关注命名实体识别、关系抽取和时间信息抽取；在知识融合阶段，探讨了实体对齐和实体链接；在知识计算阶段，聚焦于知识推理。深入分析了每个阶段面临的挑战，并针对特有挑战展望了未来的研究方向。

关键词: 时序知识图谱, 知识抽取, 时间信息抽取, 知识融合, 知识推理

Abstract: As a bridge connecting data, knowledge, and intelligence, knowledge graph has been widely applied in fields such as search assistance, intelligent recommendation, question-answering systems, and natural language processing. However, with the expansion of application scenarios, static knowledge graph has shown limitations in handling dynamic knowledge. The emergence of temporal knowledge graph addresses this shortcoming by integrating temporal information into the graph structure, enabling a more accurate representation of dynamic changes in knowledge. This paper provides a comprehensive study on the construction of temporal knowledge graph. It begins by introducing the concept of temporal knowledge graph and clarifying its value in handling dynamic knowledge. Then, it delves into the construction process of temporal knowledge graph, dividing the core process into three key stages: knowledge extraction, knowledge fusion, and knowledge computing. Subsequently, it thoroughly organizes each stage, and each stage is detailed with task definitions, research summaries, and the application of large language models. In the knowledge extraction stage, it focuses on named entity recognition, relation extraction, and time information extraction; in the fusion stage, it discusses entity alignment and entity linking; and in the computation stage, it focuses on knowledge reasoning. Finally, it explores the challenges faced at each stage and looks forward to future research directions.

Key words: temporal knowledge graph, knowledge extraction, temporal information extraction, knowledge fusion, knowledge reasoning

陆佳民, 张晶, 冯钧, 安琪. 时序知识图谱构建研究综述[J]. 计算机科学与探索, 2025, 19(2): 295-315.

LU Jiamin, ZHANG Jing, FENG Jun, AN Qi. Survey on Construction Method of Temporal Knowledge Graph[J]. Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology, 2025, 19(2): 295-315.

参考文献

[1] SINGHAL A. Introducing the knowledge graph: things, not strings[EB/OL]. [2024-04-15]. https://search.googleblog.com/2012/05/introducing-knowledge-graph-things-not.html.
[2] LEBLAY J, CHEKOL M W, LEBLAY J, et al. Deriving validity time in knowledge graph[C]//Proceedings of the Web Conference 2018. New York: ACM, 2018: 1771-1776.
[3] PAREJA A, DOMENICONI G, CHEN J, et al. EvolveGCN: evolving graph convolutional networks for dynamic graphs[J]. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2020, 34(4): 5363-5370.
[4] LEETARU K, SCHRODT P A. GDELT: global data on events, location, and tone, 1979—2012[J]. ISA Annual Convention, 2013, 2(4): 1-49.
[5] GARCÍA-DURÁN A, DUMANČIĆ S, NIEPERT M. Learning sequence encoders for temporal knowledge graph completion[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Stroudsburg: ACL, 2018: 4816-4821.
[6] QIU Z Y, WU J, HU W B, et al. Temporal link prediction with motifs for social networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2021, 35(3): 3145-3158.
[7] GAO Y Y, CHOWDHURY T, WU L F, et al. Modeling health stage development of patients with dynamic attributed graphs in online health communities[J]. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2023, 35(2): 1831-1843.
[8] BO M M, ZHANG M H. Learning dynamic coherence with graph attention network for biomedical entity linking[C]//Proceedings of the 2021 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. Piscataway: IEEE, 2021: 1-8.
[9] XIA L H, HUANG C, XU Y, et al. Multi-behavior sequential recommendation with temporal graph transformer[J]. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2022, 35(6): 6099-6112.
[10] ZHU R, LIU B, ZHANG R W, et al. OEQA: knowledge- and intention-driven intelligent ocean engineering question-answering framework[J]. Applied Sciences, 2023, 13(23): 12915.
[11] CHEN X Y, LI M Z, GAO S, et al. Follow the timeline! Generating an abstractive and extractive timeline summary in chronological order[J]. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 2023, 41(1): 9.
[12] GUO S N, LIN Y F, WAN H Y, et al. Learning dynamics and heterogeneity of spatial-temporal graph data for traffic forecasting[J]. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2021, 34(11): 5415-5428.
[13] ZHU J W, HAN X, DENG H H, et al. KST-GCN: a knowledge-driven spatial-temporal graph convolutional network for traffic forecasting[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2022, 23(9): 15055-15065.
[14] ORLANDI F, GRAUX D, O’SULLIVAN D. Benchmarking RDF metadata representations: reification, singleton property and RDF[C]//Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 15th International Conference on Semantic Computing. Piscataway: IEEE, 2021: 233-240.
[15] RAU L F. Extracting company names from text[C]//Proceedings of the 7th IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence Application. Piscataway: IEEE, 1991: 29-32.
[16] PETASIS G, VICHOT F, WOLINSKI F, et al. Using machine learning to maintain rule-based named-entity recognition and classification systems[C]//Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics. Stroudsburg: ACL, 2001: 426-433.
[17] BIKEL D M, SCHWARTZ R, WEISCHEDEL R M. An algorithm that learns what􀆳s in a name[J]. Machine Learning, 1999, 34(1): 211-231.
[18] MORWAL S. Named entity recognition using hidden Markov model (HMM)[J]. International Journal on Natural Language Computing, 2012, 1(4): 15-23.
[19] CHIEU H L, NG H T. Named entity recognition: a maximum entropy approach using global information[C]//Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 2002.
[20] LI L S, ZHOU R P, HUANG D G. Two-phase biomedical named entity recognition using CRFs[J]. Computational Biology and Chemistry, 2009, 33(4): 334-338.
[21] KAZAMA J, MAKINO T, OHTA Y, et al. Tuning support vector machines for biomedical named entity recognition[C]//Proceedings of the ACL-02 Workshop on Natural Language Processing in the Biomedical Domain-Volume 3. Stroudsburg: ACL, 2002: 1-8.
[22] COLLOBERT R, WESTON J, BOTTOU L, et al. Natural language processing (almost) from scratch[EB/OL]. [2024-04-15]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1103.0398.
[23] HUANG Z H, XU W, YU K. Bidirectional LSTM-CRF models for sequence tagging[EB/OL]. [2024-04-15]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1508.01991.
[24] CHIU J P C, NICHOLS E. Named entity recognition with bidirectional LSTM-CNNs[J]. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2016, 4: 357-370.
[25] AONE C, HALVERSON L, HAMPTON T, et al. SRA: description of the IE2 system used for MUC-7[C]//Proceedings of the 7th Message Understanding Conference. Stroudsburg: ACL, 1998.
[26] NEBHI K. A rule-based relation extraction system using DBpedia and syntactic parsing[C]//Proceedings of the NLP & DBpedia Workshop Co-located with the 12th International Semantic Web Conference, 2013.
[27] DOWNEY D, SCHOENMACKERS S, ETZIONI O. Sparse information extraction: unsupervised language models to the rescue[C]//Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Stroudsburg: ACL, 2007: 696-703.
[28] KAMBHATLA N. Combining lexical, syntactic, and semantic features with maximum entropy models for information extraction[C]//Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Stroudsburg: ACL, 2004.
[29] ZHOU G D, SU J, ZHANG J, et al. Exploring various knowledge in relation extraction[C]//Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics. Stroudsburg: ACL, 2005: 427-434.
[30] CULOTTA A, MCCALLUM A, BETZ J. Integrating probabilistic extraction models and data mining to discover relations and patterns in text[C]//Proceedings of the Main Conference on Human Language Technology Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association of Computational Linguistics. Stroudsburg: ACL, 2006: 296-303.
[31] ZENG D, LIU K, LAI S, et al. Relation classification via convolutional deep neural network[C]//Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers. Stroudsburg: ACL, 2014: 2335-2344.
[32] NGUYEN T H, GRISHMAN R. Relation extraction: perspective from convolutional neural networks[C]//Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Vector Space Modeling for Natural Language Processing. Stroudsburg: ACL, 2015: 39-48.
[33] SOCHER R, HUVAL B, MANNING C D, et al. Semantic compositionality through recursive matrix-vector spaces[C]// Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning. Stroudsburg: ACL, 2012: 1201-1211.
[34] GENG Z Q, CHEN G F, HAN Y M, et al. Semantic relation extraction using sequential and tree-structured LSTM with attention[J]. Information Sciences, 2020, 509: 183-192.
[35] MIWA M, BANSAL M. End-to-end relation extraction using LSTMs on sequences and tree structures[EB/OL]. [2024-04-15]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1601.00770.
[36] ZHENG S C, WANG F, BAO H Y, et al. Joint extraction of entities and relations based on a novel tagging scheme[EB/OL]. [2024-04-15]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.05075.
[37] DAI D, XIAO X Y, LYU Y J, et al. Joint extraction of entities and overlapping relations using position-attentive sequence labeling[J]. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2019, 33(1): 6300-6308.
[38] XU X, ZHU Y Q, WANG X H, et al. How to unleash the power of large language models for few-shot relation extraction?[EB/OL]. [2024-04-15]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.01555.
[39] WADHWA S, AMIR S, WALLACE B C. Revisiting relation extraction in the era of large language models[C]//Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Stroudsburg: ACL, 2023: 15566-15589.
[40] LIM C G, JEONG Y S, CHOI H J. Survey of temporal information extraction[J]. Journal of Information Processing Systems, 2019, 15(4): 931-956.
[41] CHINCHOR N, ROBINSON P. MUC-7 named entity task definition[C]//Proceedings of the 7th Conference on Message Understanding. Stroudsburg: ACL, 1997: 1-21.
[42] FERRO L, MANI I, SUNDHEIM B, et al. Tides temporal annotation guidelines version 1.0.2[EB/OL]. [2024-04-15]. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=981a8a22c9a8bff1e19f2c964ed77e8a41c71900.
[43] PUSTEJOVSKY J, CASTAÑO J, INGRIA R, et al. TimeML: robust specification of event and temporal expressions in text[C]//New Directions in Question Answering, Papers from 2003 AAAI Spring Symposium.Menlo Park: AAAI, 2003: 28-34.
[44] PARIENTE T, FUENTES J M, SANGUINO M A, et al. A model for semantic annotation of environmental resources: the TaToo semantic framework[C]//Environmental Software Systems. Frameworks of eEnvironment: 9th IFIP WG 5.11 International Symposium. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2011: 419-427.
[45] JEONG Y S, JOO W T, DO H W, et al. Korean TimeML and Korean TimeBank[C]//Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 2016: 356-359.
[46] HAFFAR N, HKIRI E, ZRIGUI M. Enrichment of Arabic TimeML corpus[C]//Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computational Collective Intelligence. Cham: Springer, 2020: 655-667.
[47] VERHAGEN M, GAIZAUSKAS R, SCHILDER F, et al. The TempEval challenge: identifying temporal relations in text[J]. Language Resources and Evaluation, 2009, 43(2): 161-179.
[48] VERHAGEN M, SAURÍ R, CASELLI T, et al. SemEval-2010 task 13: TempEval-2[C]//Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation. New York: ACM, 2010: 57-62.
[49] UZZAMAN N, LLORENS H, DERCZYNSKI L, et al. SemEval-2013 task 1: TempEval-3: evaluating time expressions, events, and temporal relations[C]//Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation. Stroudsburg: ACL, 2013: 1-9.
[50] BETHARD S, DERCZYNSKI L, SAVOVA G, et al. SemEval-2015 task 6: clinical TempEval[C]//Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation. Stroudsburg: ACL, 2015: 806-814.
[51] BETHARD S, SAVOVA G, CHEN W T, et al. SemEval-2016 task 12: clinical TempEval[C]//Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation. Stroudsburg: ACL, 2016: 1052-1062.
[52] TOURILLE J, FERRET O, TANNIER X, et al. LIMSI-COT at SemEval-2017 task 12: neural architecture for temporal information extraction from clinical narratives[C]//Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation. Stroudsburg: ACL, 2017: 597-602.
[53] STRÖTGEN J, GERTZ M, STRÖTGEN J, et al. HeidelTime: high quality rule-based extraction and normalization of temporal expressions[C]//Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation. New York: ACM, 2010: 321-324.
[54] CHANG A X, MANNING C D. SUTIME: a library for recognizing and normalizing time expressions[C]//Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 2012: 3735-3740.
[55] LLORENS H, SAQUETE E, NAVARRO B, et al. TIPSem (English and Spanish): evaluating CRFs and semantic roles in TempEval-2[C]//Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation. New York: ACM, 2010: 284-291.
[56] UZZAMAN N, ALLEN J F, UZZAMAN N, et al. TRIPS and TRIOS system for TempEval-2: extracting temporal information from text[C]//Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation. New York: ACM, 2010: 276-283.
[57] HOSSAIN T, RAHMAN M M, ISLAM S. Temporal information extraction from textual data using long short term memory recurrent neural network[J].Journal of Computer Technology & Applications, 2018, 9(2): 1-6.
[58] STRÖTGEN J, ZELL J, GERTZ M. HeidelTime: tuning English and developing Spanish resources for TempEval-3[C]//Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation. Stroudsburg: ACL, 2013: 15-19.
[59] ZAVARELLA V, TANEV H. FSS-TimEx for TempEval-3: extracting temporal information from text[C]//Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation. Stroudsburg: ACL, 2013: 58-63.
[60] ZHONG X S, SUN A X, CAMBRIA E. Time expression analysis and recognition using syntactic TokenTypes and general heuristic rules[C]//Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Stroudsburg: ACL, 2017: 420-429.
[61] BETHARD S. ClearTK-TimeML: a minimalist approach to TempEval 2013[C]//Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation. Stroudsburg: ACL, 2013: 10-14.
[62] FILANNINO M, BROWN G, NENADIC G. ManTIME: temporal expression identification and normalization in the TempEval-3 challenge[C]//Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation. Stroudsburg: ACL, 2013: 53-57.
[63] DING W T, GAO G J, SHI L F, et al. A pattern-based approach to recognizing time expressions[J]. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2019, 33(1): 6335-6342.
[64] ESCRIBANO N, RIGAU G, AGERRI R. A modular approach for multilingual timex detection and normalization using deep learning and grammar-based methods[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2023, 273: 110612.
[65] WANG S H, SUN X F, LI X Y, et al. GPT-NER: named entity recognition via large language models[EB/OL]. [2024-04-15]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.10428.
[66] ASHOK D, LIPTON Z C. PromptNER: prompting for named entity recognition[EB/OL]. [2024-04-15]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.15444.
[67] WEI X, CUI X Y, CHENG N, et al. ChatIE: zero-shot information extraction via chatting with ChatGPT[EB/OL]. [2024-04-15]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.10205.
[68] ZHENG Y, KE W, LIU Q, et al. Making LLMs as fine-grained relation extraction data augmentor[C]//Proceedings of the 33rd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2024: 6660-6668.
[69] 冯钧, 畅阳红, 陆佳民, 等. 基于大语言模型的水工程调度知识图谱的构建与应用[J]. 计算机科学与探索, 2024, 18(6): 1637-1647.
FENG J, CHANG Y H, LU J M, et al. Construction and application of knowledge graph for water engineering scheduling based on large language model[J]. Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology, 2024, 18(6): 1637-1647.
[70] GAUTAM A K, LANGE L, STRÖTGEN J. Discourse-aware in-context learning for temporal expression normalization[EB/OL]. [2024-05-23]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.07775.
[71] WU H L. Empirical study on temporal expression extraction via large language model[C]//Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Computer Applications and Information Systems, 2024: 670-677.
[72] CHEN M H, TIAN Y T, YANG M H, et al. Multilingual knowledge graph embeddings for cross-lingual knowledge alignment[EB/OL]. [2024-04-15]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1611. 03954.
[73] SUN Z Q, HU W, LI C K. Cross-lingual entity alignment via joint attribute-preserving embedding[C]//Proceedings of the 16th International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2017: 628-644.
[74] SUN Z Q, HU W, ZHANG Q H, et al. Bootstrapping entity alignment with knowledge graph embedding[C]//Proceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2018: 4396-4402.
[75] WU Y T, LIU X, FENG Y S, et al. Relation-aware entity alignment for heterogeneous knowledge graphs[EB/OL]. [2024-04-15]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.08210.
[76] WU Y T, LIU X, FENG Y S, et al. Jointly learning entity and relation representations for entity alignment[EB/OL]. [2024-04-15]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.09317.
[77] XU C J, SU F L, LEHMANN J. Time-aware graph neural networks for entity alignment between temporal knowledge graphs[EB/OL]. [2024-04-15]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2203. 02150.
[78] CAI L, MAO X, MA M R, et al. A simple temporal information matching mechanism for entity alignment between temporal knowledge graphs[EB/OL]. [2024-04-15]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.09677.
[79] XU C J, SU F L, XIONG B, et al. Time-aware entity alignment using temporal relational attention[C]//Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022. New York: ACM, 2022: 788-797.
[80] LIU X Z, WU J Y, LI T Y, et al. Unsupervised entity alignment for temporal knowledge graphs[C]//Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023. New York: ACM, 2023: 2528-2538.
[81] JIA W, MA R Z, YAN L, et al. Time-aware structure matching for temporal knowledge graph alignment[J]. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 2024, 151: 102300.
[82] YAN Y C, LIU L H, BAN Y K, et al. Dynamic knowledge graph alignment[J]. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2021, 35(5): 4564-4572.
[83] BAI L Y, SONG X T, ZHU L. Joint multi-feature information entity alignment for cross-lingual temporal knowledge graph with BERT[J]. IEEE Transactions on Big Data, 2024: 1-13.
[84] CHONG W H, LIM E P, COHEN W. Collective entity linking in tweets over space and time[C]//Advances in Information Retrieval-Proceedings of the 39th European Conference on IR Research. Cham: Springer, 2017: 82-94.
[85] YANG X Y, GU X T, LIN S, et al. Learning dynamic context augmentation for global entity linking[EB/OL]. [2024-04-15]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.02117.
[86] ZAPOROJETS K, KAFFEE L A, DELEU J, et al. TempEL: linking dynamically evolving and newly emerging entities[C]//Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35, New Orleans, Nov 28-Dec 9, 2022: 1850-1866.
[87] JIANG X H, SHEN Y H, SHI Z C, et al. Unlocking the power of large language models for entity alignment[EB/OL]. [2024-04-15]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.15048.
[88] YANG L Y, CHEN H Y, WANG X, et al. Two heads are better than one: integrating knowledge from knowledge graphs and large language models for entity alignment[EB/OL]. [2024-04-15]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.16960.
[89] SONG S Z, LI S S, YU J, et al. DIM: dynamic integration of multimodal entity linking with large language model[EB/OL]. [2024-08-14]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.12019.
[90] LIPPOLIS A S, KLIRONOMOS A, MILON-FLORES D F, et al. Enhancing entity alignment between Wikidata and ArtGraph using LLMs[C]//Proceedings of the 2023 International Joint Workshop on Semantic Web and Ontology Design for Cultural Heritage, 2023.
[91] TRIVEDI R, DAI H, WANG Y, et al. Know-Evolve: deep temporal reasoning for dynamic knowledge graphs[C]//Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, 2017: 3462-3471.
[92] TRIVEDI R, FARAJTABAR M, BISWAL P, et al. DyRep: learning representations over dynamic graphs[C]//Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Learning Representations, 2019.
[93] JIN W, QU M, JIN X S, et al. Recurrent event network: autoregressive structure inference over temporal knowledge graphs[EB/OL]. [2024-04-15]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.05530.
[94] SCHLICHTKRULL M, KIPF T N, BLOEM P, et al. Modeling relational data with graph convolutional networks[C]//Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Semantic Web. Cham: Springer, 2018: 593-607.
[95] ZHU C C, CHEN M H, FAN C J, et al. Learning from history: modeling temporal knowledge graphs with sequential copy-generation networks[J]. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2021, 35(5): 4732-4740.
[96] LIU K Z, ZHAO F, XU G D, et al. RETIA: relation-entity twin-interact aggregation for temporal knowledge graph extrapolation[C]//Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 39th International Conference on Data Engineering. Piscataway: IEEE, 2023: 1761-1774.
[97] LIU R N, YIN G S, LIU Z C, et al. Reinforcement learning with time intervals for temporal knowledge graph reasoning[J]. Information Systems, 2024, 120: 102292.
[98] DONG H, WANG P Y, XIAO M, et al. Temporal inductive path neural network for temporal knowledge graph reasoning[J]. Artificial Intelligence, 2024, 329: 104085.
[99] DASGUPTA S S, RAY S N, TALUKDAR P. HyTE: hyperplane-based temporally aware knowledge graph embedding[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Stroudsburg: ACL, 2018: 2001-2011.
[100] GOEL R, KAZEMI S M, BRUBAKER M, et al. Diachronic embedding for temporal knowledge graph completion[J]. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2020, 34(4): 3988-3995.
[101] LACROIX T, OBOZINSKI G, USUNIER N. Tensor decompositions for temporal knowledge base completion[EB/OL]. [2024-04-15]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.04926.
[102] JAIN P, RATHI S, MAUSAM, et al. Temporal knowledge base completion: new algorithms and evaluation protocols[EB/OL]. [2024-04-15]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.05035.
[103] YANG J F, YING X H, SHI Y J, et al. Tensor decompositions for temporal knowledge graph completion with time perspective[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2024, 237: 121267.
[104] ZHANG F, CHEN H Z, SHI Y Z, et al. Joint framework for tensor decomposition-based temporal knowledge graph completion[J]. Information Sciences, 2024, 654: 119853.
[105] SHAO P P, ZHANG D W, YANG G H, et al. Tucker decomposition-based temporal knowledge graph completion[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2022, 238: 107841.
[106] YU M, GUO J J, YU J, et al. TBDRI: block decomposition based on relational interaction for temporal knowledge graph completion[J]. Applied Intelligence, 2023, 53(5): 5072-5084.
[107] XIA Y W, WANG D, LIU Q, et al. Chain-of-history reasoning for temporal knowledge graph forecasting[C]//Proceedings of the Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024. Stroudsburg: ACL, 2024: 16144-16159.
[108] WANG J P, SUN K, LUO L H, et al. Large language models-guided dynamic adaptation for temporal knowledge graph reasoning[EB/OL]. [2024-08-14]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.14170.
[109] LIAO R T, JIA X, LI Y Z, et al. GenTKG: generative forecasting on temporal knowledge graph with large language models[C]//Proceedings of the Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2024. Stroudsburg: ACL, 2024: 4303-4317.
[110] LUO R L, GU T L, LI H L, et al. Chain of history: learning and forecasting with LLMs for temporal knowledge graph completion[EB/OL]. [2024-04-15]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.06072.
[111] LI Q, CHEN Z, JI C, et al. LLM-based multi-level knowledge generation for few-shot knowledge graph completion[C]//Proceedings of the 33rd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2024: 2135-2143.

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

218

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	0	58	0	160

	来源	本网站

	次数	218
	比例	100%

摘要

263

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

94	0	169

	来源	本网站

	次数	263
	比例	100%