Two-Population Comprehensive Learning PSO Algorithm Based on Particle Per-mutation

doi:10.3778/j.issn.1673-9418.2005016

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to solve the problems of low population diversity and easy to fall into local optimization of particle swarm optimization (PSO), a two-population comprehensive learning PSO algorithm based on particle permutation (PP-CLPSO) is proposed. According to the convergence characteristic of PSO algorithm and the chaotic idea of Logistic mapping, the PSO population and chaotic population of parallel evolution are designed. Combined with the particle numbering mechanism, the same sign structure and the same position structure of particles in the two-population system are formed, in which the inertia weight of particles is adaptively adjusted according to the fitness value. When the search process falls into local optimization, the particles with poor fitness under the same position structure of the PSO population carry out the particle replacement operation according to the same sign structure between the chaotic population and the chaotic population, which realizes the reasonable scheduling of the resources of the two-population system and increases the diversity of the population. Furthermore, the global exploration and local search are carried out by combining the co-particle learning strategy of two-way search and the local learning strategy of linearly decreasing search step, which improves the accuracy of the algorithm. Nine benchmark functions are selected in the experiment, and the proposed algorithm is compared with four improved particle swarm optimization algorithms and four swarm intelligence algorithms at the same time. The experimental results show that the PP-CLPSO algorithm has better comprehensive performance in terms of solution accuracy and convergence speed.

Key words: particle swarm optimization (PSO), two-population system, particle numbering, particle permutation, comprehensive learning

摘要：

针对粒子群算法（PSO）种群多样性低和易于陷入局部最优等问题，提出一种粒子置换的双种群综合学习PSO算法（PP-CLPSO）。根据PSO算法的收敛特性和Logistic映射的混沌思想，设计并行进化的PSO种群和混沌化种群，结合粒子编号机制，形成双种群系统中粒子的同号结构和同位结构，其中粒子的惯性权重根据适应度值自适应调节；当搜索过程陷入局部最优时，PSO种群同位结构下适应度值较差的粒子，根据与混沌化种群间的同号结构执行粒子置换操作，实现了双种群系统资源的合理调度，增加了种群的多样性；进而综合双向搜索的同位粒子学习策略和线性递减搜索步长的局部学习策略，进行全局探勘和局部搜索，提高了算法的求解精度。实验选取9个基准测试函数，同时与4个改进的粒子群算法和4个群智能算法进行对比验证，实验结果表明，PP-CLPSO算法在求解精度和收敛速度等方面具备较好的综合性能。

关键词: 粒子群算法（PSO）, 双种群系统, 粒子编号, 粒子置换, 综合学习

JI Wei, LI Yingmei, JI Weidong, ZHANG Long. Two-Population Comprehensive Learning PSO Algorithm Based on Particle Per-mutation[J]. Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology, 2021, 15(4): 766-776.

纪伟, 李英梅, 季伟东, 张珑. 粒子置换的双种群综合学习PSO算法[J]. 计算机科学与探索, 2021, 15(4): 766-776.

References

[1] KENNEDY J, EBERHART R. Particle swarm optimization[C]//Proceedings of the 1995 International Conference on Neural Networks, Perth, Nov 27-Dec 1, 1995. Piscataway: IEEE, 1995: 1942-1948.
[2] WANG D F, MENG L, ZHAO W J. Improved bare bones particle swarm optimization with adaptive search center[J].Chinese Journal of Computers, 2016, 39(12): 2652-2667.王东风, 孟丽, 赵文杰. 基于自适应搜索中心的骨干粒子群算法[J]. 计算机学报, 2016, 39(12): 2652-2667.
[3] WANG L J, YIN Y L, ZHONG Y W. Cuckoo search algorithm with dimension by dimension improvement[J]. Journal of Software, 2013, 24(11): 2687-2698.王李进, 尹义龙, 钟一文. 逐维改进的布谷鸟搜索算法[J].软件学报, 2013, 24(11): 2687-2698.
[4] WANG X J, PENG H, DENG C S, et al. Firefly algorithm based on uniform local search and variable step size[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2018, 38(3): 715-721.王晓静, 彭虎, 邓长寿, 等. 基于均匀局部搜索和可变步长的萤火虫算法[J]. 计算机应用, 2018, 38(3): 715-721.
[5] XIE C W, ZHANG F L, LU J B, et al. Multi-objective firefly algorithm based on multiply cooperative strategies[J]. Acta Electronica Sinica, 2019, 47(11): 2359-2367.谢承旺, 张飞龙, 陆建波, 等. 一种多策略协同的多目标萤火虫算法[J]. 电子学报, 2019, 47(11): 2359-2367.
[6] YU S H, ZHU S L, MA Y, et al. A variable step size firefly algorithm for numerical optimization[J]. Applied Mathematics & Computation, 2015, 263: 214-220.
[7] ZHU G, KWONG S. Gbest- guided artificial bee colony algorithm for numerical function optimization[J]. Applied Mathematics & Computation, 2010, 217(7): 3166-3173.
[8] QIAN X Y, GE H W, CAI M. Decomposition and continuous mutation-based multi-objective particle swarm optimization[J]. Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2019, 14(3): 464-470.钱小宇, 葛洪伟, 蔡明. 基于目标空间分解和连续变异的多目标粒子群算法[J]. 智能系统学报, 2019, 14(3): 464-470.
[9] ROCHA H R O, SILVESTRE L J, CELESTE W C. Forecast of distributed electrical generation system capacity based on seasonal micro generators using ELM and PSO[J]. IEEE Latin America Transactions, 2018, 16(4): 1136-1141.
[10] LIU Z H, WEI H L, LI X H, et al. Global identification of electrical and mechanical parameters in PMSM drive based on dynamic self- learning PSO[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2018, 33(12): 10858-10871.
[11] LI X, WU S, LI X. Particle swarm optimization-support vector machine model for machinery fault diagnoses in high-voltage circuit breakers[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2020, 33(1): 6.
[12] SUN H, DENG Z C, ZHAO J, et al. Hybrid mean center opposition- based learning particle swarm optimization[J].Acta Electronica Sinica, 2019, 47(9): 1809-1818.孙辉, 邓志诚, 赵嘉, 等. 混合均值中心反向学习粒子群优化算法[J]. 电子学报, 2019, 47(9): 1809-1818.
[13] ZHANG X, WANG P, XING J C, et al. Particle swarm optimization algorithms with decreasing inertia weight based on Gaussian function[J]. Application Research of Computers,
2012, 29(10): 3710-3712.张迅, 王平, 邢建春, 等. 基于高斯函数递减惯性权重的粒子群优化算法[J]. 计算机应用研究, 2012, 29(10): 3710-3712.
[14] WANG L, WANG X F, MIAO F Y. Particle swarm optimization algorithm with two dimensional disturbance and adaptive learning factor[J]. Journal of Chinese Computer Systems,2018, 39(11): 2353-2357.王磊, 王行甫, 苗付友. 一种带有二维扰动和自适应学习因子的粒子群算法[J]. 小型微型计算机系统, 2018, 39(11): 2353-2357.
[15] LI M, CHEN H, WANG X. An improved particle swarm optimization algorithm with adaptive inertia weights[J]. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 2019, 18(3): 833-866.
[16] LIANG J J, QIN A K, SUGANTHAN P N. Comprehensive learning particle swarm optimizer for global optimization of multimodal functions[J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2006, 10(3): 281-295.
[17] MO S, ZENG J C, TAN Y. Particle swarm optimization based on self- organizing topology driven by fitness[C]//Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Computational Aspects of Social Networks, Taiyuan, Sep 26- 28, 2010.Washington: IEEE Computer Society, 2010: 23-26.
[18] KAI S X, YI Y. A new particle swarm algorithm by modifying its topology structure[C]//Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics,Guangzhou, Jul 12-15, 2015. Piscataway: IEEE, 2015: 88-92.
[19] LIU Q X, VAN WYK B J, SUN Y X. Small world network based dynamic topology for particle swarm optimization[C]//Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Natural Computation, Zhangjiajie, Aug 15-17, 2015. Piscataway:IEEE, 2016: 289-294.
[20] LIANG J J, SUGANTHAN P N. Dynamic multi-swarm particle swarm optimizer[C]//Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Swarm Intelligence Symposium, Pasadena, Jun 8-10, 2005.Piscataway: IEEE, 2005: 124-129.
[21] CHENGKHUNTOD K, KRUATRACHUE B, SIRIBOON K.A modified multi- swarm optimization with interchange GBEST and particle redistribution[C]//Proceedings of the 5th International Electrical Engineering Congress, Pattaya,Mar 8-10, 2017. Piscataway: IEEE, 2017: 1-4.
[22] DENG X L, WEI B, ZENG H, et al. A multi-population based self-adaptive migration PSO[J]. Acta Electronica Sinica, 2018,46(8): 1858-1865.邓先礼, 魏波, 曾辉, 等. 基于多种群的自适应迁移PSO算法[J]. 电子学报, 2018, 46(8): 1858-1865.
[23] KAYHAN A H, CEYLAN H, AYVAZ M T, et al. PSOLVER:a new hybrid particle swarm optimization algorithm for solving continuous optimization problems[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2010, 37(10): 6798-6808.
[24] XIA X W, LIU J N, GAO K F, et al. Particle swarm optimization algorithm with reverse-learning and local-learning behavior[J]. Chinese Journal of Computers, 2015, 38(7):1397-1407.夏学文, 刘经南, 高柯夫, 等. 具备反向学习和局部学习能力的粒子群算法[J]. 计算机学报, 2015, 38(7): 1397-1407.
[25] WANG F, ZHANG H, LI K, et al. A hybrid particle swarm optimization algorithm using adaptive learning strategy[J].Information Sciences, 2018, 436/437: 162-177.
[26] ZENG Y Y, FENG Y X, ZHAO W T. Adaptive mutative scale chaos particles swarm optimization based on logistic mapping[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2017, 29(10):2241-2246.曾艳阳, 冯云霞, 赵文涛. 基于logistic 映射的自适应变尺度混沌粒子群算法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2017, 29(10): 2241-2246.
[27] CAO L L, XU L H, GOODMAN E D. A neighbor- based learning particle swarm optimizer with short-term and longterm memory for dynamic optimization problems[J]. Information Sciences, 2018, 453: 463-485.
[28] XU L F, HUANG Z S, YANG Z Z, et al. Mixed particle swarm optimization algorithm with multistage disturbances[J]. Journal of Software, 2019, 30(6): 1835-1852.徐利锋, 黄祖胜, 杨中柱, 等. 引入多级扰动的混合型粒子群优化算法[J]. 软件学报, 2019, 30(6): 1835-1852.