Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (1): 253-260.DOI: 10.3778/j.issn.1673-9418.2008065
• Theory and Algorithm • Previous Articles
ZHANG Jianhua1, LI Fangfang1,+(), LIU Yilin1, YANG Lan2
Received:
2020-08-20
Revised:
2020-10-27
Online:
2022-01-01
Published:
2020-11-09
About author:
ZHANG Jianhua, born in 1975, Ph.D., professor, Ph.D. supervisor. His research interests include knowledge innovation and knowledge service.Supported by:
通讯作者:
+ E-mail: 904822596@qq.com作者简介:
张建华(1975—),男,河北承德人,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要研究方向为知识创新、知识服务。基金资助:
CLC Number:
ZHANG Jianhua, LI Fangfang, LIU Yilin, YANG Lan. Research on Tacit Knowledge Transfer Based on Fusion of Three-Way Decision and Fuzzy Rough Set[J]. Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology, 2022, 16(1): 253-260.
张建华, 李方方, 刘艺琳, 杨岚. 融合TWD与FRS的隐性知识转移研究[J]. 计算机科学与探索, 2022, 16(1): 253-260.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://fcst.ceaj.org/EN/10.3778/j.issn.1673-9418.2008065
决策区域 | 用户知识评价 | 知识转移决策 |
---|---|---|
正域 | 满意 | 转移 |
负域 | 不满意 | 不转移 |
Table 1 Two-way decision
决策区域 | 用户知识评价 | 知识转移决策 |
---|---|---|
正域 | 满意 | 转移 |
负域 | 不满意 | 不转移 |
知识转移决策 | 用户满意 | |
---|---|---|
满意 | 不满意 | |
转移 | | |
延迟转移 | | |
不转移 | | |
Table 2 Knowledge transfer cost matrix
知识转移决策 | 用户满意 | |
---|---|---|
满意 | 不满意 | |
转移 | | |
延迟转移 | | |
不转移 | | |
属性方面 | 属性权重 | 属性方面 | 属性权重 |
---|---|---|---|
| 0.061 7 | | 0.175 2 |
| 0.057 2 | | 0.025 0 |
| 0.178 8 | | 0.002 3 |
| 0.133 0 | | 0.065 9 |
| 0.069 0 | | 0.077 6 |
| 0.134 6 |
Table 3 Attribute weight
属性方面 | 属性权重 | 属性方面 | 属性权重 |
---|---|---|---|
| 0.061 7 | | 0.175 2 |
| 0.057 2 | | 0.025 0 |
| 0.178 8 | | 0.002 3 |
| 0.133 0 | | 0.065 9 |
| 0.069 0 | | 0.077 6 |
| 0.134 6 |
用户 | 属性 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| 0.58 | 0.98 | 0.60 | 0.02 | 0.17 | 0.11 | 0.18 | 0.45 | 0.80 | 0.15 | 0.16 |
| 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.30 | 0.29 | 0.28 | 0.82 | 0.11 | 0.78 | 0.82 | 0.39 | 0.62 |
| 0.38 | 0.22 | 0.30 | 0.56 | 0.12 | 0.86 | 0.53 | 0.19 | 0.68 | 0.58 | 0.36 |
| 0.93 | 0.23 | 0.30 | 0.34 | 0.10 | 0.38 | 0.43 | 0.04 | 0.89 | 0.94 | 0.21 |
| 0.07 | 0.34 | 0.20 | 0.37 | 0.14 | 0.46 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 0.17 | 0.45 | 0.30 |
| 0.87 | 0.05 | 0.40 | 0.19 | 0.68 | 0.28 | 0.07 | 0.82 | 0.32 | 0.88 | 0.69 |
| 0.93 | 0.84 | 0.60 | 0.33 | 0.21 | 0.32 | 0.18 | 0.56 | 0.84 | 0.69 | 0.15 |
| 0.30 | 0.57 | 0.20 | 0.77 | 0.36 | 0.27 | 0.01 | 0.19 | 0.18 | 0.31 | 0.93 |
| 0.62 | 0.24 | 0.30 | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.89 | 0.29 | 0.45 | 0.71 | 0.97 | 0.53 |
| 0.49 | 0.73 | 0.10 | 0.62 | 0.21 | 0.76 | 0.41 | 0.19 | 0.08 | 0.59 | 0.33 |
| 0.96 | 0.65 | 0.80 | 0.24 | 0.22 | 0.20 | 0.95 | 0.65 | 0.60 | 0.01 | 0.73 |
Table 4 User knowledge requirements
用户 | 属性 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| 0.58 | 0.98 | 0.60 | 0.02 | 0.17 | 0.11 | 0.18 | 0.45 | 0.80 | 0.15 | 0.16 |
| 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.30 | 0.29 | 0.28 | 0.82 | 0.11 | 0.78 | 0.82 | 0.39 | 0.62 |
| 0.38 | 0.22 | 0.30 | 0.56 | 0.12 | 0.86 | 0.53 | 0.19 | 0.68 | 0.58 | 0.36 |
| 0.93 | 0.23 | 0.30 | 0.34 | 0.10 | 0.38 | 0.43 | 0.04 | 0.89 | 0.94 | 0.21 |
| 0.07 | 0.34 | 0.20 | 0.37 | 0.14 | 0.46 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 0.17 | 0.45 | 0.30 |
| 0.87 | 0.05 | 0.40 | 0.19 | 0.68 | 0.28 | 0.07 | 0.82 | 0.32 | 0.88 | 0.69 |
| 0.93 | 0.84 | 0.60 | 0.33 | 0.21 | 0.32 | 0.18 | 0.56 | 0.84 | 0.69 | 0.15 |
| 0.30 | 0.57 | 0.20 | 0.77 | 0.36 | 0.27 | 0.01 | 0.19 | 0.18 | 0.31 | 0.93 |
| 0.62 | 0.24 | 0.30 | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.89 | 0.29 | 0.45 | 0.71 | 0.97 | 0.53 |
| 0.49 | 0.73 | 0.10 | 0.62 | 0.21 | 0.76 | 0.41 | 0.19 | 0.08 | 0.59 | 0.33 |
| 0.96 | 0.65 | 0.80 | 0.24 | 0.22 | 0.20 | 0.95 | 0.65 | 0.60 | 0.01 | 0.73 |
转移决策 | 用户 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
转移 | 56 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 55 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 |
延迟转移 | 80 | 7 | 4 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 87 | 1 | 7 | 10 | 0 |
不转移 | 1 464 | 1 592 | 1 588 | 1 578 | 1 600 | 1 600 | 1 458 | 1 599 | 1 592 | 1 587 | 1 598 |
Table 5 The number of three-way decision knowledge transfer
转移决策 | 用户 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
转移 | 56 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 55 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 |
延迟转移 | 80 | 7 | 4 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 87 | 1 | 7 | 10 | 0 |
不转移 | 1 464 | 1 592 | 1 588 | 1 578 | 1 600 | 1 600 | 1 458 | 1 599 | 1 592 | 1 587 | 1 598 |
用户 | | 用户 | |
---|---|---|---|
| 0.6 | | 0.5 |
| 0.6 | | 0.5 |
| 0.3 | | 0.4 |
| 0.5 | | 0.3 |
| 0.3 | | 0.1 |
| 0.3 |
Table 6 Conditional probability calculation results
用户 | | 用户 | |
---|---|---|---|
| 0.6 | | 0.5 |
| 0.6 | | 0.5 |
| 0.3 | | 0.4 |
| 0.5 | | 0.3 |
| 0.3 | | 0.1 |
| 0.3 |
用户 | | 用户 | |
---|---|---|---|
| 297.28 | | 256.95 |
| 288.50 | | 240.10 |
| 147.04 | | 193.20 |
| 242.25 | | 146.67 |
| 144.00 | | 48.86 |
| 144.00 |
Table 7 Knowledge transfer costs
用户 | | 用户 | |
---|---|---|---|
| 297.28 | | 256.95 |
| 288.50 | | 240.10 |
| 147.04 | | 193.20 |
| 242.25 | | 146.67 |
| 144.00 | | 48.86 |
| 144.00 |
[1] | 张建华, 叶建文, 李方方. 隐性知识外显案例之多案例诱导型适配研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2020, 43(1):98-103. |
ZHANG J H, YE J W, LI F F. Research on multi-case derivational adaptation of tacit knowledge explicit cases[J]. Information Studies: Theory & Application, 2020, 43(1):98-103. | |
[2] | 杨陈, 唐明凤. 关系视角的高校科研团队断裂带对隐性知识转移影响研究[J]. 情报科学, 2016, 34(10):20-25. |
YANG C, TANG M F. Effect of team faultlines on the tacit knowledge transfer in the scientific research team of university from the perspective of relationship[J]. Infor-mation Science, 2016, 34(10):20-25. | |
[3] | 李敏, 宋艳玲, 黎梓婷. 基于SNA的产业集群内知识转移——以佛山照明集群为例[J]. 系统工程, 2017, 35(1):46-57. |
LI M, SONG Y L, LI Z T. Knowledge transfer networks in cluster based on SNA—the case of Foshan lighting cluster[J]. System Engineering, 2017, 35(1):46-57. | |
[4] |
QIU X L, HAUGLAND S A. The role of regulatory focus and trustworthiness in knowledge transfer and leakage in alliances[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2019, 83:162-173.
DOI URL |
[5] |
LETMATHE P, RÖßLER M. Tacit knowledge transfer and spillover learning in ramp-ups[J]. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 2019, 39(6):1099-1121.
DOI URL |
[6] | 苏世彬, 陈美乔. 企业专利风险对校企隐性知识转移绩效影响研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2018, 36(3):502-512. |
SU S B, CHEN M Q. Research on enterprise patent risk affect tacit knowledge transfer performance in university-enterprise cooperation[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2018, 36(3):502-512. | |
[7] |
DANGELICO R M, GARAVELLI A C, PETRUZZELLI A M. A system dynamics model to analyze technology districts’ evolution in a knowledge-based perspective[J]. Technovation, 2010, 30(2):142-153.
DOI URL |
[8] | 李国彦, 李南. 创业社会网络中隐性知识转移激励模型研究——代理人市场-声誉理论视角的探索[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2016, 33(7):139-143. |
LI G Y, LI N. The incentive model of tacit knowledge transfer in start-up social network—based on reputation effects model[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2016, 33(7):139-143. | |
[9] | 张向先, 李昆, 郭顺利. 企业研发团队隐性知识转移绩效的影响因素及实证研究——基于知识生态的视角[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2016, 39(10):57-64. |
ZHANG X X, LI K, GUO S L. An empirical study on the influencing factors of tacit knowledge transfer performance of enterprise R&D teams—based on the perspective of knowledge ecology[J]. Information Studies: Theory & Application, 2016, 39(10):57-64. | |
[10] | 杨霁琳, 张贤勇, 唐孝, 等. 基于最优相似度三支决策的模糊粗糙集模型[J]. 计算机科学, 2018, 45(10):27-32. |
YANG Q L, ZHANG X Y, TANG X, et al. Fuzzy rough set model based on three-way decisions of optimal similar degrees[J]. Computer Science, 2018, 45(10):27-32. | |
[11] | 刘盾, 李天瑞, 李华雄. 粗糙集理论: 基于三支决策视角[J]. 南京大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 49(5):574-581. |
LIU D, LI T R, LI H X. Rough set theory: a three-way decisions perspective[J]. Journal of Nanjing University (Natural Science Edition), 2013, 49(5):574-581. | |
[12] | 梁德翠, 曹雯. 三支决策模型及其研究现状分析[J]. 电子科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 21(1):104-112. |
LIANG D C, CAO W. Three-way decisions: model and the state of the art[J]. Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 21(1):104-112. | |
[13] | HU B Q, WONG H, YIU K C. On two novel types of three-way decisions in three-way decision spaces[J]. Int-ernational Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2017, 82(3):285-306. |
[14] | WANG P X, YAO Y Y. CE3: a three-way clustering method based on mathematical morphology[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2018, 155(9):55-64. |
[15] | 钱文彬, 彭莉莎, 王映龙, 等. 不完备混合决策系统的三支决策模型与规则获取方法[J]. 计算机应用研究, 2020, 37(5):1421-1427. |
QIAN W B, PENG L S, WANG Y L, et al. Three-way decisions model and rule acquisition method for incomplete composite decision system[J]. Application Research of Computers, 2020, 37(5):1421-1427. | |
[16] | WANG T X, LI H X, ZHOU X Z, et al. A prospect theory-based three-way decision model[J]. Knowledge-Based Sys-tems, 2020, 203:106129. |
[17] |
LIU P D, WANG Y M, JIA F, et al. A multiple attribute decision making three-way model for intuitionistic fuzzy numbers[J]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2020, 119(1):177-203.
DOI URL |
[18] | 张萌, 孙秉珍, 楚晓丽. 基于邻域代价敏感三支决策的痛风诊断模型[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2020, 56(16):218-225. |
ZHANG M, SUN B Z, CHU X L. Gout diagnosis model based on neighborhood cost-sensitive three-way decision[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2020, 56(16):218-225. | |
[19] | 张晓, 杨燕燕. 一种基于模糊粗糙集的快速特征选择算法[J]. 数据采集与处理, 2019, 34(3):538-547. |
ZHANG X, YANG Y Y. Fast feature selection algorithm based on fuzzy rough sets[J]. Journal of Data Acquisition & Processing, 2019, 34(3):538-547. | |
[20] | 张建华. 知识管理系统含非精确方面自学习案例视图匹配研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2015, 34(10):134-139. |
ZHANG J H. Research on matching method for self-learning cases of knowledge management system including imprecise aspects[J]. Journal of Information, 2015, 34(10):134-139. |
[1] | REN Hao, LIU Baisong, SUN Jinyang. Advances and Perspectives on Knowledge Transfer Based Cross-Domain Recom-mendation [J]. Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology, 2020, 14(11): 1813-1827. |
[2] | XU Yi, WANG Xusheng. Multi-Category Classification Model and Multilevel Incremental Algorithms [J]. Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology, 2019, 13(8): 1431-1440. |
[3] | LIU Dun, LIANG Decui. Generalized Three-Way Decisions and Special Three-Way Decisions [J]. Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology, 2017, 11(3): 502-510. |
[4] | SU Ting, YU Hong. Three-Way Decision Clustering Algorithm for Incomplete Data Based on q-Nearest Neighbors [J]. Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology, 2016, 10(6): 875-883. |
[5] | HUANG Shunliang, LI Jianlin, WANG Qi. Three-Way Decision Approach to Customer Segmentation [J]. Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology, 2014, 8(6): 743-750. |
[6] | ZHANG Yanping, ZOU Huijin, XING Hang, ZHAO Shu. Dealing with Samples in Boundary Regions of Three-Way Decisions Model Based on CCA [J]. Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology, 2014, 8(5): 593-600. |
[7] | LI Jianlin, HUANG Shunliang. Multistage Three-Way Decisions of Spam SMS Filtering Model [J]. Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology, 2014, 8(2): 226-233. |
[8] | WANG Baoxiang, ZHOU Xianzhong, SHENG Yin, LU Xiaoming, MAO Ke. Research on Interface of Humanware Service-Oriented Decision Support System [J]. Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology, 2013, 7(1): 46-54. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
/D:/magtech/JO/Jwk3_kxyts/WEB-INF/classes/