群体行为识别深度学习方法研究综述

doi:10.3778/j.issn.1673-9418.2108079

计算机科学与探索 ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (4): 775-790.DOI: 10.3778/j.issn.1673-9418.2108079

群体行为识别深度学习方法研究综述

裴利沈¹, 赵雪专²^,⁺()

1.河南财经政法大学计算机与信息工程学院,郑州 450046
2.郑州航空工业管理学院智能工程学院,郑州 450046

收稿日期:2021-08-23 修回日期:2021-11-03 出版日期:2022-04-01 发布日期:2021-11-08
通讯作者: + E-mail: xuezhuansci@126.com
作者简介:裴利沈（1988—）,女,河南郑州人,博士,讲师,硕士生导师,CCF会员,主要研究方向为行为识别、图像处理、计算机视觉、机器学习。
赵雪专（1986—）,男,河南郑州人,博士,讲师,CCF会员,主要研究方向为目标检测、目标跟踪、显著性检测、异常行为检测、计算机视觉等。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(61806073);河南省重点研发与推广专项（科技攻关）基金(192102210097);河南省重点研发与推广专项（科技攻关）基金(192102210126);河南省重点研发与推广专项（科技攻关）基金(212102210160)

Survey of Collective Activity Recognition Based on Deep Learning

PEI Lishen¹, ZHAO Xuezhuan²^,⁺()

1. School of Computer and Information Engineering, Henan University of Economics and Law, Zhengzhou 450046, China
2. School of Intelligent Engineering, Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics, Zhengzhou 450046, China

Received:2021-08-23 Revised:2021-11-03 Online:2022-04-01 Published:2021-11-08
About author:PEI Lishen, born in 1988, Ph.D., lecturer, M.S. supervisor, member of CCF. Her research interests include action recognition, image processing, computer vision and machine learning.
ZHAO Xuezhuan, born in 1986, Ph.D., lecturer, member of CCF. His research interests include object detection, object tracking, saliency detection, abnormal behavior detection, computer vision, etc.
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(61806073);Key Research & Development and Promotion Project of Henan Province(192102210097);Key Research & Development and Promotion Project of Henan Province(192102210126);Key Research & Development and Promotion Project of Henan Province(212102210160)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

群体行为识别是计算机视觉领域应用广泛且亟待解决的重要研究问题。伴随着深度神经网络的发展,群体行为识别与理解的宽度与深度也在不断扩展。通过调研近十年来群体行为识别的研究文献,确定了目前群体行为识别研究的问题定义;指出了群体行为识别研究现存的问题与挑战;在深度学习网络架构下,描述了从早期仅仅对群体行为进行分类识别,到如今更加侧重于对行为群体中活动细节理解的群体行为识别算法的发展历程;重点介绍了以卷积神经网络CNN/3DCNN、双流网络Two-Stream Network、循环神经网络RNN/LSTM和Transformer等网络架构为基础的,主流群体行为识别算法的核心网络架构和主要研究思路,对各算法在常用公共数据集上的识别效果进行了对比;对标注了群体行为类型和个体行为类别等多级标签的常用的群体行为数据集进行了梳理和对比。期望通过客观的对各种算法优缺点的讨论分析,引发读者提出群体行为识别研究的新思路或新问题。最后,对群体行为分析的未来发展进行了展望,期待能够启发新的研究方向。

关键词: 群体行为识别, 深度学习, 深度神经网络架构, 卷积神经网络（CNN）, 长短时记忆神经网络（LSTM）

Abstract:

Collective activity recognition is an important issue in the field of computer vision, with wide application and urgently to be solved. With the development of deep neural network, the width and depth of collective activity recognition and understanding are expanding. Through investigating the research literature of collective activity recognition in recent ten years, the problem definition of the collective activity recognition is determined. The existing problems and challenges of collective activity recognition are pointed out. In the framework of deep neural network, this paper describes the development of the collective activity recognition algorithm from the early stage which only classifies and recognizes the collective activity categories to the current stage which focuses more on the understanding of the details of activities in the group behavior. Then, based on the network architectures such as CNN/3DCNN, Two-Stream Network, RNN/LSTM and Transformer, the core network architecture and the main research ideas of the mainstream collective activity recognition methods are mainly introduced. The recognition performance of these algorithms on common datasets is compared. The commonly used collective activity recognition datasets labeled with multilevel labels such as collective activity types and individual activity categories are combed and compared. Through objective and fair discussion and analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of various algorithms, it is expected to prompt readers to propose new solutions or new problems of collective activity recogni-tion. Finally, the future development of collective activity recognition is prospected, which is expected to stimulate new research directions.

Key words: collective activity recognition, deep learning, deep neural network architecture, convolutional neural network (CNN), long short-term memory (LSTM) neural network

中图分类号:

TP391

裴利沈, 赵雪专. 群体行为识别深度学习方法研究综述[J]. 计算机科学与探索, 2022, 16(4): 775-790.

PEI Lishen, ZHAO Xuezhuan. Survey of Collective Activity Recognition Based on Deep Learning[J]. Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology, 2022, 16(4): 775-790.

图/表 17

参考文献 71

[1]	国家自然科学基金委员会. 国家自然科学基金“十三五”发展规划[EB/OL]. (2016-06-14)[2021-05-06]. https://www.nsfc.gov.cn/publish/portal0/xxgk/043/info72249.htm.
	National Natural Science Foundation. The 13th five-year plan of national natural science foundation of China[EB/OL]. (2016-06-14)[2021-05-06]. https://www.nsfc.gov.cn/publish/portal0/xxgk/043/info72249.htm.
[2]	中国国务院. 国家中长期科学和技术发展规划纲要[EB/OL]. (2006-02-09)[2021-05-06]. http://www.gov.cn/jrzg/2006-02/09/content_183787.htm.
	China State Council. Outline of the national program for long- and medium-term scientific and technological development[EB/OL]. (2006-02-09)[2021-05-06]. http://www.gov.cn/jrzg/2006-02/09/content_183787.htm.
[3]	中华人民共和国国民经济和社会发展第十三个五年规划纲要[EB/OL]. 中国工业和信息化部(2016-03-17)[2021-05-06]. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2016-03/17/content_5054992.htm.
	Outline of the 13th five-year plan for National Economic and Social Development of the People’s Republic of China[EB/OL]. Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of China (2016-03-17)[2021-05-06]. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2016-03/17/content_5054992.htm.
[4]	TANG J H, SHU X B, YAN R, et al. Coherence constrained graph LSTM for group activity recognition[J]. IEEE Trans-actions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2022, 44(2):636-647.
[5]	IBRAHIM M S, MURALIDHARAN S, DENG Z W, et al. A hierarchical deep temporal model for group activity reco-gnition[C]// Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, Jun 26-Jul 1, 2016. Washington: IEEE Computer Society, 2016: 1971-1980.
[6]	QI M S, WANG Y H, QIN J, et al. stagNet: an attentive semantic RNN for group activity and individual action reco-gnition[J]. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2020, 30(2):549-565. DOI URL
[7]	TANG Y S, LU J W, WANG Z A, et al. Learning semantics-preserving attention and contextual interaction for group activity recognition[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Pro-cessing, 2019, 28(10):4997-5012.
[8]	ZHOU B L, WANG X G, TANG X O. Random field topic model for semantic region analysis in crowded scenes from tracklets[C]// Proceedings of the 24th IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Colorado Springs, Jun 21-23, 2011. Washington: IEEE Computer Society, 2011: 3441-3448.
[9]	CHOI W, SAVARESE S. Understanding collective activities of people from videos[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Ana-lysis and Machine Intelligence, 2014, 36(6):1242-1257.
[10]	RAMANATHAN V, YAO B P, LI F F. Social role discovery in human events[C]// Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Confer-ence on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Portland, Jun 23-28, 2013. Washington: IEEE Computer Society, 2013: 2475-2482.
[11]	CHEN L C, SCHWING A G, YUILLE A L, et al. Learning deep structured models[C]// Proceedings of the 2015 Inter-national Conference on Machine Learning, Lille, Jul 6-11, 2015. New York: ACM, 2015: 1-8.
[12]	WU Z R, LIN D H, TANG X O. Deep Markov random field for image modeling[C]// LNCS 9912: Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Computer Vision, Amsterdam, Oct 11-14, 2016. Cham: Springer, 2016: 295-312.
[13]	AMER M R, XIE D, ZHAO M T, et al. Cost-sensitive top-down/bottom-up inference for multiscale activity recognition[C]// LNCS 7575: Proceedings of the 12th European Confer-ence on Computer Vision, Florence, Oct 7-13, 2012. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2012: 187-200.
[14]	SHU T M, XIE D, ROTHROCK B, et al. Joint inference of groups, events and human roles in aerial videos[C]// Pro-ceedings of the 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Boston, Jun 7-12, 2015. Washington: IEEE Computer Society, 2015: 4576-4584.
[15]	BAGAUTDINOV T, ALAHI A, FLEURET F, et al. Social scene understanding: end-to-end multi-person action localiza-tion and collective activity recognition[C]// Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Honolulu, Jul 21-26, 2017. Washington: IEEE Computer Society, 2017: 3425-3434.
[16]	SIMONYAN K, ZISSERMAN A. Two-stream convolutional networks for action recognition in videos[C]// Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Sys-tems, Montreal, Dec 8-13, 2014. Red Hook: Curran Asso-ciates, 2014: 568-576.
[17]	FEICHTENHOFER C, PINZ A, ZISSERMAN A, et al. Convolutional two-stream network fusion for video action recognition[C]// Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, Jun 27-30, 2016. Washington: IEEE Computer Society, 2016: 1933-1941.
[18]	WANG M S, NI B B, YANG X K. Recurrent modeling of interaction context for collective activity recognition[C]// Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Honolulu, Jul 21-26, 2017. Washington: IEEE Computer Society, 2017: 7408-7416.
[19]	HU G Y, CUI B, HE Y, et al. Progressive relation learning for group activity recognition[C]// Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Seattle, Jun 13-19, 2020. Piscataway: IEEE, 2020: 977-986.
[20]	BORJA-BORJA L F, LOPEZ J A, SAVAL-CALVO M, et al. Deep learning architecture for group activity recognition using description of local motions[C]// Proceedings of the 2020 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Glasgow, Jul 19-24, 2020. Piscataway: IEEE, 2020: 1-8.
[21]	SHU X B, ZHANG L Y, SUN Y L, et al. Host-parasite: graph LSTM-in-LSTM for group activity recognition[J]. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Sys-tems, 2021, 32(2):663-674.
[22]	CAO Y, LIU C, HUANG Z, et al. Skeleton-based action recognition with temporal action graph and temporal ada-ptive graph convolution structure[J]. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2021, 80(19):29139-29162. DOI URL
[23]	JAIN A, ZAMIR A R, SAVARESE S, et al. Structural-RNN: deep learning on spatio-temporal graphs[C]// Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, Jun 27-30, 2016. Washington: IEEE Computer Society, 2016: 5308-5317.
[24]	LIANG X D, SHEN X H, FENG J S, et al. Semantic object parsing with graph LSTM[C]// LNCS 9905: Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Computer Vision, Amster-dam, Oct 11-14, 2016. Cham: Springer, 2016: 125-143.
[25]	MOESLUND T B, HILTON A, KRÜGER V. A survey of advances in vision-based human motion capture and ana-lysis[J]. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 2006, 104(2/3):90-126. DOI URL
[26]	POPPE R. A survey on vision-based human action recogni-tion[J]. Image & Vision Computing, 2010, 28(6):976-990.
[27]	TURAGA P, CHELLAPPA R, SUBRAHMANIAN V S, et al. Machine recognition of human activities: a survey[J]. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2008, 18(11):1473-1488. DOI URL
[28]	JI S, XU W, YANG M, et al. 3D convolutional neural networks for human action recognition[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2013, 35(1):221-231. DOI URL
[29]	TRAN D, BOURDEV L, FERGUS R, et al. Learning spatio-temporal features with 3D convolutional networks[C]// Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Santiago, Dec 7-13, 2015. Washington: IEEE Computer Society, 2015: 4489-4497.
[30]	DONAHUE J, HENDRICKS L A, GUADARRAMA S, et al. Long-term recurrent convolutional networks for visual recognition and description[C]// Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Boston, Jun 7-12, 2015. Washington: IEEE Computer Society, 2015: 2625-2634.
[31]	GAVRILYUK K, SANFORD R, JAVAN M, et al. Actor-transformers for group activity recognition[C]// Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Seattle, Jun 13-19, 2020. Piscataway: IEEE, 2020: 836-845.
[32]	刘锁兰, 顾嘉晖, 王洪元, 等. 基于关联分区和ST-GCN的人体行为识别[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2021, 57(13):168-175.
	LIU S L, GU J H, WANG H Y, et al. Human behavior reco-gnition based on associative partition and ST-GCN[J]. Com-puter Engineering and Applications, 2021, 57(13):168-175.
[33]	胡根生, 张乐军, 张艳. 结合张量特征和孪生支持向量机的群体行为识别[J]. 北京理工大学学报, 2019, 39(10):1063-1068.
	HU G S, ZHANG L J, ZHANG Y. Group activity recog-nition based on tensor features and twin support vector machines[J]. Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2019, 39(10):1063-1068.
[34]	NÚÑEZ J C, PANTRIGO J J, MONTEMAYOR A S, et al. Convolutional neural networks and long short-term memory for skeleton-based human activity and hand gesture recog-nition[J]. Pattern Recognition, 2018, 76:80-94. DOI URL
[35]	SAHBI H. Learning Chebyshev basis in graph convolu-tional networks for skeleton-based action recognition[J]. arXiv: 2104. 05482, 2021.
[36]	KETKAR N, MOOLAYIL J. Convolutional neural networks. In deep learning with Python[EB/OL]. (2021-03-04) [2021-05-06]. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-5364-9_6.
[37]	WU J C, WANG L M, WANG L, et al. Learning actor rela-tion graphs for group activity recognition[C]// Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Long Beach, Jun 16-20, 2019. Pisca-taway: IEEE, 2019: 9964-9974.
[38]	IBRAHIM M S, MORI G. Hierarchical relational networks for group activity recognition and retrieval[C]// LNCS 11207: Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Computer Vision, Munich, Sep 8-14, 2018. Cham: Springer, 2018: 742-758.
[39]	AZAR S M, ATIGH M G, NICKABADI A, et al. Convo-lutional relational machine for group activity recognition[C]// Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Seattle, Jun 13-19, 2020. Piscataway: IEEE, 2020: 7884-7893.
[40]	李洪均, 丁宇鹏, 李超波, 等. 基于特征融合时序分割网络的行为识别研究[J]. 计算机研究与发展, 2020, 57(1):145-158.
	LI H J, DING Y P, LI C B, et al. Action recognition of temporal segment network based on feature fusion[J]. Journal of Computer Research and Development, 2020, 57(1):145-158.
[41]	ASAD M, JIANG H, YANG J, et al. Multi-level two-stream fusion-based spatio-temporal attention model for violence detection and localization[J]. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 2022, 36(1):1-25.
[42]	CHOI W, SHAHID K, SAVARESE S. What are they doing?: Collective activity classification using spatio-temporal rela-tionship among people[C]// Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops, Kyoto, Sep 27-Oct 4, 2009. Washington: IEEE Computer Society, 2009: 1282-1289.
[43]	KRIZHEVSKY A, SUTSKEVER I, HINTON G E. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks[C]// Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference on Neural Infor-mation Processing Systems, Lake Tahoe, Dec 3-6, 2012. Red Hook: Curran Associates, 2012: 1106-1114.
[44]	SZEGEDY C, LIU W, JIA Y Q, et al. Going deeper with convolutions[C]// Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Boston, Jun 7-12, 2015. Washington: IEEE Computer Society, 2015: 1-9.
[45]	ZALLUHOGLU C, IKIZLER-CINBIS N. Region based multi-stream convolutional neural networks for collective activity recognition[J]. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 2019, 60:170-179. DOI URL
[46]	GRAVES A, MOHAMED A, HINTON G E. Speech recog-nition with deep recurrent neural networks[C]// Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Vancouver, May 26-31, 2013. Piscataway: IEEE, 2013: 6645-6649.
[47]	HOCHREITER S, SCHMIDHUBER J. Long short-term memory[J]. Neural Computation, 1997, 9(8):1735-1780. DOI URL
[48]	GRAVES A, JAITLY N. Towards end-to-end speech reco-gnition with recurrent neural networks[C]// Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Machine Learning, Beijing, Jun 21-26, 2014. New York: ACM, 2014: 1764-1772.
[49]	DAS S, KOPERSKI M, BREMOND F, et al. A fusion of appearance based CNNs and temporal evolution of skeleton with LSTM for daily living action recognition[J]. arXiv: 1802. 00421v1, 2018.
[50]	HERATH S, HARANDI M, PORIKLI F. Going deeper into action recognition: a survey[J]. Image and Vision Computing, 2017, 60:4-21. DOI URL
[51]	RAMANATHAN V, HUANG J, ABU-El-HAIJA S, et al. Detecting events and key actors in multi-person videos[C]// Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, Jun 27-30, 2016. Washington: IEEE Computer Society, 2016: 3043-3053.
[52]	SHU T M, TODOROVIC S, ZHU S C. CERN: confidence-energy recurrent network for group activity recognition[C]// Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Honolulu, Jul 21-26, 2017. Washington: IEEE Computer Society, 2017: 4255-4263.
[53]	QI M, QIN J, LI A, et al. stagNet: an attentive semantic RNN for group activity recognition[C]// LNCS 11214: Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Computer Vision, Munich, Sep 8-14, 2018. Cham: Springer, 2018: 101-117.
[54]	DENG Z W, VAHDAT A, HU H X, et al. Structure inference machines: recurrent neural networks for analyzing relations in group activity recognition[C]// Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Reco-gnition, Las Vegas, Jun 27-30, 2016. Washington: IEEE Computer Society, 2016: 4772-4781.
[55]	VASWANI A, SHAZEER N, PARMAR N, et al. Attention is all you need[C]// Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2017, Long Beach, Dec 4-9, 2017. Red Hook: Curran Associates, 2017: 5998-6008.
[56]	DOERSCH C, GUPTA A, ZISSERMAN A. CrossTrans-formers:spatially-aware few-shot transfer[C]// Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference on Neural Information Pro-cessing Systems, Dec 6-12, 2020. Montreal: MIT Press, 2020: 1-10.
[57]	TAN H, BANSAL M. LXMERT: learning cross-modality encoder representations from transformers[C]// Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Con-ference on Natural Language Processing, Hong Kong, China, Nov 3-7, 2019. Stroudsburg: ACL, 2019: 5099-5110.
[58]	KUMAR M, WEISSENBORN D, KALCHBRENNER N. Colorization transformer[C]// Proceedings of the 9th Interna-tional Conference on Learning Representations, Sydney, Aug 30-31, 2021: 1-8.
[59]	YANG F Z, YANG H, FU J L, et al. Learning texture trans-former network for image super-resolution[C]// Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Seattle, Jun 13-19, 2020. Piscataway: IEEE, 2020: 5790-5799.
[60]	DOSOVITSKIY A, BEYER L, KOLESNIKOV A, et al. An image is worth 16×16 words: transformers for image reco-gnition at scale[J]. arXiv: 2010. 11929, 2020.
[61]	KHAN S, NASEER M, HAYAT M, et al. Transformers in vision: a survey[J]. arXiv: 2101. 01169, 2021.
[62]	CHEN H, WANG Y, GUO T, et al. Pre-trained image pro-cessing transformer[J]. arXiv: 2012. 00364, 2020.
[63]	WANG X, YESHWANTH C, NIEBNER M. Scene former: indoor scene generation with transformers[J]. arXiv: 2012. 09793, 2020.
[64]	LI R, YANG S, ROSS D A, et al. Learn to dance with AIST++: music conditioned 3D dance generation[J]. arXiv: 2101. 08779, 2021.
[65]	NEIMARK D, BAR O, ZOHAR M, et al. Video transformer network[J]. arXiv: 2102. 00719, 2021.
[66]	GIRDHAR R, CARREIRA J J, DOERSCH C, et al. Video action transformer network[C]// Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Long Beach, Jun 15-20, 2019. Piscataway: IEEE, 2019: 244-253.
[67]	CHOI W, SHAHID K, SAVARESE S. Learning context for collective activity recognition[C]// Proceedings of the 24th IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Reco-gnition, Colorado Springs, Jun 20-25, 2011. Washington: IEEE Computer Society, 2011: 3273-3280.
[68]	CHOI W, SAVARESE S. A unified framework for multi-target tracking and collective activity recognition[C]// LNCS 7575: Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Computer Vision, Florence, Oct 7-13, 2012. Berlin, Heidel-berg: Springer, 2012: 215-230.
[69]	DENG Z W, ZHAI M Y, CHEN L, et al. Deep structured models for group activity recognition[C]// Proceedings of the 2016 British Machine Vision Conference, Swansea, Sep 19-22, 2016. Durham: BMVA Press, 2016: 179.
[70]	LAN T, SIGAL L, MORI G. Social roles in hierarchical models for human activity recognition[C]// Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Providence, Jun 16-21, 2012. Washington: IEEE Computer Society, 2012: 1354-1361.
[71]	LU L H, LU Y, YU R Z, et al. GAIM: graph attention interaction model for collective activity recognition[J]. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2020, 22(2):524-539. DOI URL

Architecture	Advantages	Disadvantages
CNN/3DCNN	1. 擅于空间域/时空域特征表征 2. 通用、紧凑、易于实现 3. 高效	1. 视频数据计算开销大 2. 特征表征能力低于双流网络
Two-Stream Network	1. 空间域与时间域信息全面表征 2. 识别率效果好	1. 分别对RGB和光流数据处理,计算量大 2. 两网络分别训练,时间开销大
RNN/LSTM	1. 擅长处理长度不一的序列数据 2. 易于与其他架构结合	1. 数据需求量大,训练困难 2. 计算费时,对硬件要求高
Transformer	1. 擅长时序数据处理,可并行计算 2. 不必依赖CNN,可直接对图像块序列分类	1. 不能利用序列顺序信息,引入位置嵌入 2. 在群体行为识别领域的应用尚不成熟

Architecture	Advantages	Disadvantages
CNN/3DCNN	1. 擅于空间域/时空域特征表征 2. 通用、紧凑、易于实现 3. 高效	1. 视频数据计算开销大 2. 特征表征能力低于双流网络
Two-Stream Network	1. 空间域与时间域信息全面表征 2. 识别率效果好	1. 分别对RGB和光流数据处理,计算量大 2. 两网络分别训练,时间开销大
RNN/LSTM	1. 擅长处理长度不一的序列数据 2. 易于与其他架构结合	1. 数据需求量大,训练困难 2. 计算费时,对硬件要求高
Transformer	1. 擅长时序数据处理,可并行计算 2. 不必依赖CNN,可直接对图像块序列分类	1. 不能利用序列顺序信息,引入位置嵌入 2. 在群体行为识别领域的应用尚不成熟

Method	Module	Architecture	Average recognition accuracy/%
Method	Module	Architecture	Volleyball	Collective Activity
Ibrahim et al^[5]	CNN、LSTM	CNN/3DCNN+LSTM	51.1	81.5
Bagautdinov et al^[15]	FCN、RNN	CNN/3DCNN+RNN	89.9	—
Hu et al^[19]	SRG、FD、RG	—	—	91.4
Wu et al^[37]	CNN、GCN	CNN/3DCNN	91.5	90.2
Gavrilyuk et al^[31]	CNN、3DCNN、I3D、Transformer	CNN+Transformer	94.4	92.8
Ibrahim et al^[38]	CNN、HRN、RCRG	CNN/3DCNN	89.5	—
Azar et al^[39]	CNN、CRM	CNN/3DCNN	93.0	85.8
Wang et al^[18]	SCNN、MCNN、LSTM	Two-Stream Network+LSTM	—	89.4
Zalluhoglu et al^[45]	SCNN、SRCNN、TCNN、TRCNN	Two-Stream Network	72.4	88.9
Shu et al^[52]	CNN、LSTM	CNN/3DCNN+LSTM	83.6	88.3
Qi et al^[53]	RPN、RNN	RNN/LSTM	89.3	89.1
Deng et al^[54]	CNN、RNN	CNN/3DCNN+RNN/LSTM	—	81.2

Method	Module	Architecture	Average recognition accuracy/%
Method	Module	Architecture	Volleyball	Collective Activity
Ibrahim et al^[5]	CNN、LSTM	CNN/3DCNN+LSTM	51.1	81.5
Bagautdinov et al^[15]	FCN、RNN	CNN/3DCNN+RNN	89.9	—
Hu et al^[19]	SRG、FD、RG	—	—	91.4
Wu et al^[37]	CNN、GCN	CNN/3DCNN	91.5	90.2
Gavrilyuk et al^[31]	CNN、3DCNN、I3D、Transformer	CNN+Transformer	94.4	92.8
Ibrahim et al^[38]	CNN、HRN、RCRG	CNN/3DCNN	89.5	—
Azar et al^[39]	CNN、CRM	CNN/3DCNN	93.0	85.8
Wang et al^[18]	SCNN、MCNN、LSTM	Two-Stream Network+LSTM	—	89.4
Zalluhoglu et al^[45]	SCNN、SRCNN、TCNN、TRCNN	Two-Stream Network	72.4	88.9
Shu et al^[52]	CNN、LSTM	CNN/3DCNN+LSTM	83.6	88.3
Qi et al^[53]	RPN、RNN	RNN/LSTM	89.3	89.1
Deng et al^[54]	CNN、RNN	CNN/3DCNN+RNN/LSTM	—	81.2

Dataset	Video number	Collective activity number	Person-level activity number	Activity description
The Volleyball Dataset	55	8	9	Sports activity
The Collective Activity Dataset	44	5	8	Daily activity
The Collective Activity Extended Dataset	75	6	8	Daily activity
The Choi’s New Dataset	32	6	3	Daily activity
The Nursing Home Dataset	80	2	6	Daily activity
UCLA Courtyard Dataset	106 min	6	10	Daily activity
Broadcast Field Hockey Dataset	58	3	11	Sports activity

群体行为识别深度学习方法研究综述

Survey of Collective Activity Recognition Based on Deep Learning

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 17

参考文献 71

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

Dataset	Year	Best average accuracy/%	Corresponding algorithm
The Collective Activity Dataset	2009	92.8	Gavrilyuk et al^[31]
The Collective Activity Extended Dataset	2011	91.2	Lu et al^[71]
The Choi’s New Dataset	2012	89.2	Lu et al^[71]
UCLA Courtyard Dataset	2012	86.9	Qi et al^[53]
The Nursing Home Dataset	2012	85.5	Deng et al^[54]
Broadcast Field Hockey Dataset	2012	62.9	Lan et al^[70]
The Volleyball Dataset	2016	94.4	Gavrilyuk et al^[31]

[1]	安凤平, 李晓薇, 曹翔. 权重初始化-滑动窗口CNN的医学图像分类[J]. 计算机科学与探索, 2022, 16(8): 1885-1897.
[2]	曾凡智, 许露倩, 周燕, 周月霞, 廖俊玮. 面向智慧教育的知识追踪模型研究综述[J]. 计算机科学与探索, 2022, 16(8): 1742-1763.
[3]	刘艺, 李蒙蒙, 郑奇斌, 秦伟, 任小广. 视频目标跟踪算法综述[J]. 计算机科学与探索, 2022, 16(7): 1504-1515.
[4]	赵小明, 杨轶娇, 张石清. 面向深度学习的多模态情感识别研究进展[J]. 计算机科学与探索, 2022, 16(7): 1479-1503.
[5]	夏鸿斌, 肖奕飞, 刘渊. 融合自注意力机制的长文本生成对抗网络模型[J]. 计算机科学与探索, 2022, 16(7): 1603-1610.
[6]	孙方伟, 李承阳, 谢永强, 李忠博, 杨才东, 齐锦. 深度学习应用于遮挡目标检测算法综述[J]. 计算机科学与探索, 2022, 16(6): 1243-1259.
[7]	刘雅芬, 郑艺峰, 江铃燚, 李国和, 张文杰. 深度半监督学习中伪标签方法综述[J]. 计算机科学与探索, 2022, 16(6): 1279-1290.
[8]	程卫月, 张雪琴, 林克正, 李骜. 融合全局与局部特征的深度卷积神经网络算法[J]. 计算机科学与探索, 2022, 16(5): 1146-1154.
[9]	童敢, 黄立波. Winograd快速卷积相关研究综述[J]. 计算机科学与探索, 2022, 16(5): 959-971.
[10]	钟梦圆, 姜麟. 超分辨率图像重建算法综述[J]. 计算机科学与探索, 2022, 16(5): 972-990.
[11]	许嘉, 韦婷婷, 于戈, 黄欣悦, 吕品. 题目难度评估方法研究综述[J]. 计算机科学与探索, 2022, 16(4): 734-759.
[12]	陆仲达, 张春达, 张佳奇, 王子菲, 许军华. 双分支网络的苹果叶部病害识别[J]. 计算机科学与探索, 2022, 16(4): 917-926.
[13]	朱伟杰, 陈莹. 双流时间域信息交互的微表情识别卷积网络[J]. 计算机科学与探索, 2022, 16(4): 950-958.
[14]	张全贵, 胡嘉燕, 王丽. 耦合用户公共特征的单类协同过滤推荐算法[J]. 计算机科学与探索, 2022, 16(3): 637-648.
[15]	姜艺, 胥加洁, 柳絮, 朱俊武. 边缘指导图像修复算法研究[J]. 计算机科学与探索, 2022, 16(3): 669-682.