Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (12): 2860-2869.DOI: 10.3778/j.issn.1673-9418.2103051
• Graphics and Image • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2021-03-16
Revised:
2021-05-08
Online:
2022-12-01
Published:
2021-04-29
About author:
WANG Yan, born in 1971, M.S., professor, member of CCF. Her research interests include pattern recognition and artificial intelligence.Supported by:
通讯作者:
+E-mail: wangyan@lut.cn作者简介:
王燕(1971—),女,甘肃泾川人,硕士,教授,CCF会员,主要研究方向为模式识别、人工智能。基金资助:
CLC Number:
WANG Yan, LIANG Qi. Fast 3D-CNN Combined with Depth Separable Convolution for Hyperspectral Image Classification[J]. Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology, 2022, 16(12): 2860-2869.
王燕, 梁琦. 快速3D-CNN结合深度可分离卷积对高光谱图像分类[J]. 计算机科学与探索, 2022, 16(12): 2860-2869.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://fcst.ceaj.org/EN/10.3778/j.issn.1673-9418.2103051
Layer(type) | Output shape | Parameter# |
---|---|---|
input_1(Input Layer) | (11,11,20,1) | 0 |
Conv3d_1(Conv3D) | (9,9,14,8) | 512 |
Conv3d_2(Conv3D) | (7,7,10,16) | 5 776 |
Conv3d_3(Conv3D) | (5,5,8,32) | 13 856 |
Reshape_1(Reshape) | (5,5,256) | 0 |
Separable_conv2d_1(separable) | (3,3,64) | 18 752 |
Separable_conv2d_1(separable) | (3,3,128) | 8 384 |
Flatten_1(Flatten) | (128) | 0 |
Dense_1(Dense) | (256) | 295 168 |
Dropout_1(Dropout) | (256) | 0 |
Dense_2(Dense) | (128) | 32 896 |
Dropout_1(Dropout) | (128) | 0 |
In total, 377 408 trainable parameters are required Train on 4 304 samples, validate on 1 845 samples |
Table 1 Parameters of model on IP dataset with Window Size of 11×11
Layer(type) | Output shape | Parameter# |
---|---|---|
input_1(Input Layer) | (11,11,20,1) | 0 |
Conv3d_1(Conv3D) | (9,9,14,8) | 512 |
Conv3d_2(Conv3D) | (7,7,10,16) | 5 776 |
Conv3d_3(Conv3D) | (5,5,8,32) | 13 856 |
Reshape_1(Reshape) | (5,5,256) | 0 |
Separable_conv2d_1(separable) | (3,3,64) | 18 752 |
Separable_conv2d_1(separable) | (3,3,128) | 8 384 |
Flatten_1(Flatten) | (128) | 0 |
Dense_1(Dense) | (256) | 295 168 |
Dropout_1(Dropout) | (256) | 0 |
Dense_2(Dense) | (128) | 32 896 |
Dropout_1(Dropout) | (128) | 0 |
In total, 377 408 trainable parameters are required Train on 4 304 samples, validate on 1 845 samples |
指标 | NumComponents | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
15 | 20 | 25 | 30 | |
Kappa×100 | 99.11 | 99.61 | 98.77 | 99.47 |
OA/% | 99.21 | 99.65 | 98.92 | 99.53 |
AA/% | 97.84 | 99.78 | 98.91 | 99.67 |
Table 2 Classification accuracy of different dimension reduction sizes based on IP dataset
指标 | NumComponents | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
15 | 20 | 25 | 30 | |
Kappa×100 | 99.11 | 99.61 | 98.77 | 99.47 |
OA/% | 99.21 | 99.65 | 98.92 | 99.53 |
AA/% | 97.84 | 99.78 | 98.91 | 99.67 |
Window size | IP | PU | SA | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kappa×100 | OA/% | AA/% | Tr_time/s | Kappa×100 | OA/% | AA/% | Tr_time/s | Kappa×100 | OA/% | AA/% | Tr_time/s | |
9×9 | 99.08 | 99.19 | 98.90 | 18.65 | 99.90 | 99.92 | 99.89 | 67.73 | 99.89 | 99.90 | 99.92 | 199.06 |
11×11 | 99.30 | 99.39 | 99.60 | 45.58 | 99.96 | 99.97 | 99.97 | 91.42 | 99.95 | 99.96 | 99.94 | 231.19 |
13×13 | 99.78 | 99.74 | 99.78 | 36.65 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 146.50 | 99.98 | 99.98 | 99.99 | 305.56 |
17×17 | 99.66 | 99.70 | 99.84 | 62.16 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 326.47 | 99.98 | 99.99 | 99.99 | 408.13 |
23×23 | 99.74 | 99.78 | 99.76 | 147.68 | 98.24 | 98.67 | 98.11 | 538.34 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 1 026.73 |
25×25 | 99.66 | 99.70 | 99.86 | 172.65 | 99.96 | 99.97 | 99.88 | 954.98 | 99.97 | 99.97 | 99.99 | 1 471.46 |
Table 3 Impact of spatial window size on proposed model on 3 datasets
Window size | IP | PU | SA | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kappa×100 | OA/% | AA/% | Tr_time/s | Kappa×100 | OA/% | AA/% | Tr_time/s | Kappa×100 | OA/% | AA/% | Tr_time/s | |
9×9 | 99.08 | 99.19 | 98.90 | 18.65 | 99.90 | 99.92 | 99.89 | 67.73 | 99.89 | 99.90 | 99.92 | 199.06 |
11×11 | 99.30 | 99.39 | 99.60 | 45.58 | 99.96 | 99.97 | 99.97 | 91.42 | 99.95 | 99.96 | 99.94 | 231.19 |
13×13 | 99.78 | 99.74 | 99.78 | 36.65 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 146.50 | 99.98 | 99.98 | 99.99 | 305.56 |
17×17 | 99.66 | 99.70 | 99.84 | 62.16 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 326.47 | 99.98 | 99.99 | 99.99 | 408.13 |
23×23 | 99.74 | 99.78 | 99.76 | 147.68 | 98.24 | 98.67 | 98.11 | 538.34 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 1 026.73 |
25×25 | 99.66 | 99.70 | 99.86 | 172.65 | 99.96 | 99.97 | 99.88 | 954.98 | 99.97 | 99.97 | 99.99 | 1 471.46 |
Dataset | Index | 2D-CNN | 3D-CNN | Multi-scale-3D-CNN | Hybrid SN | Proposed |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Indian Pines | OA/% | 80.27 | 82.62 | 81.39 | 97.75 | 99.61 |
AA/% | 68.32 | 76.51 | 75.22 | 97.54 | 99.65 | |
Kappa×100 | 75.26 | 79.25 | 81.20 | 97.44 | 99.78 | |
Salinas scene | OA/% | 96.34 | 85.00 | 94.20 | 98.06 | 99.96 |
AA/% | 94.36 | 89.63 | 96.66 | 98.80 | 99.94 | |
Kappa×100 | 95.93 | 83.20 | 93.61 | 97.85 | 99.95 | |
Pavia University | OA/% | 96.63 | 96.34 | 95.95 | 98.40 | 99.97 |
AA/% | 94.84 | 97.03 | 97.52 | 97.89 | 99.97 | |
Kappa×100 | 95.53 | 94.90 | 93.40 | 97.89 | 99.96 |
Table 4 Comparison of experimental performance under different methods
Dataset | Index | 2D-CNN | 3D-CNN | Multi-scale-3D-CNN | Hybrid SN | Proposed |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Indian Pines | OA/% | 80.27 | 82.62 | 81.39 | 97.75 | 99.61 |
AA/% | 68.32 | 76.51 | 75.22 | 97.54 | 99.65 | |
Kappa×100 | 75.26 | 79.25 | 81.20 | 97.44 | 99.78 | |
Salinas scene | OA/% | 96.34 | 85.00 | 94.20 | 98.06 | 99.96 |
AA/% | 94.36 | 89.63 | 96.66 | 98.80 | 99.94 | |
Kappa×100 | 95.93 | 83.20 | 93.61 | 97.85 | 99.95 | |
Pavia University | OA/% | 96.63 | 96.34 | 95.95 | 98.40 | 99.97 |
AA/% | 94.84 | 97.03 | 97.52 | 97.89 | 99.97 | |
Kappa×100 | 95.53 | 94.90 | 93.40 | 97.89 | 99.96 |
[1] | 张兵. 高光谱图像处理与信息提取前沿[J]. 遥感学报, 2016, 20(5): 1062-1090. |
ZHANG B. Hyperspectral image processing and information extraction[J]. Journal of Remote Sensing, 2016, 20(5): 1062-1090. | |
[2] | 张淳民, 穆廷魁, 颜廷昱, 等. 高光谱遥感技术发展与展望[J]. 航天返回与遥感, 2018, 39(3): 104-114. |
ZHANG C M, MU Y K, YAN T Y, et al. Overview of hyper-spectral remote sensing technology[J]. Spacecraft Recovery & Remote Sensing, 2018, 39(3): 104-114. | |
[3] |
ZHAO W Z, DU S H. Spectral-spatial feature extraction for hyperspectral image classification: a dimension reduction and deep learning approach[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2016, 54(8): 4544-4554.
DOI URL |
[4] |
LIU Y F, LI X R, FENG Y M, et al. Representativeness and redundancy-based band selection for hyperspectral image clas-sification[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2021, 42(9): 3534-3562.
DOI URL |
[5] |
佘海龙, 解山娟, 邹静洁. 标准分数降维的3D-CNN高光谱遥感图像分类[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2021, 57(4): 169-175.
DOI |
SHE H L, XIE S J, ZOU J J. 3D-CNN with standard score dimensionality reduction for hyperspectral remote sensing images classification[J]. Computer Engineering and Appli-cations, 2021, 57(4): 169-175. | |
[6] |
YU C Y, HAN R, SONG M P, et al. A simplified 2D-3D CNN architecture for hyperspectral image classification based on spatial-spectral fusion[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2020, 13: 2485-2501.
DOI URL |
[7] | CHEN Y S, LIN Z H, ZHAO X, et al. Deep learning-based classification of hyperspectral data[J]. IEEE Journal of Sele-cted Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sen-sing, 2014, 7(6): 2094-2107. |
[8] | CHEN Y S, ZHAO X, JIA X P. Spectral-spatial classifica-tion of hyperspectral data based on deep belief network[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Obser-vations and Remote Sensing, 2015, 8(6): 2381-2392. |
[9] |
HU W, HUANG Y Y, LI W, et al. Deep convolutional neural networks for hyperspectral image classification[J]. Journal of Sensors, 2015. DOI: 10.1155/2015/258619.
DOI |
[10] | CHEN Y S, JIANG H L, LI C Y, et al. Deep feature extrac-tion and classification of hyperspectral images based on con-volutional neural networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geo-science & Remote Sensing, 2016, 54(10): 6232-6251. |
[11] | ZHONG Z L, LI J, LUO Z M, et al. Spectral-spatial resi-dual network for hyperspectral image classification: a 3-D deep learning framework[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geosci-ence and Remote Sensing, 2018, 56(2): 847-858. |
[12] | SELLAMI A, FARAH M, FARAH I R, et al. Hyperspectral imagery classification based on semi-supervised 3-D deep neural network and adaptive band selection[J]. Expert Sys-tems with Application, 2019, 129: 246-259. |
[13] | HAN X F, JIANG T, ZHAO Z F, et al. Research on remote sensing image target recognition based on deep convolution neural network[J]. International Journal of Pattern Recogni-tion and Artificial Intelligence, 2020, 34(5): 1-20. |
[14] | CHEN L C, PAPANDREOU G, KOKKINOS I, et al. DeepLab: semantic image segmentation with deep convolutional nets, atrous convolution, and fully connected CRFs[J]. IEEE Tran-sactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2018, 40(4): 834-848. |
[15] |
FANG L, LIU G, LI S, et al. Hyperspectral image classi-fication with squeeze multibias network[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2019, 57(3): 1291-1301.
DOI URL |
[16] |
MA S J, LIU W K, CAI W, et al. Lightweight deep residual CNN for fault diagnosis of rotating machinery based on depthwise separable convolutions[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 57023-57036.
DOI URL |
[17] | 曹渝昆, 桂丽嫒. 基于深度可分离卷积的轻量级时间卷积网络设计[J]. 计算机工程, 2020, 46(9): 95-100. |
CAO Y K, GUI L Y. Design of lightweight temporal convo-lutional network based on depthwise separable convolution[J]. Computer Engineering, 2020, 46(9): 95-100. | |
[18] |
KHAN Z Y, NIU Z D. CNN with depthwise separable convolutions and combined kernels for rating prediction[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2020, 170: 114528.
DOI URL |
[19] | AHMAd M, KHAN A M, MAZZARA M, et al. A fast and compact 3-D CNN for hyperspectral image classification[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2021, 19: 1-5. |
[20] | BEN HAMIDA A, BENOIT A, LAMBERT P, et al. 3-D deep learning approach for remote sensing image classifica-tion[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sen-sing, 2018, 56(8): 4420-4434. |
[21] | CHEN S T, JIN M, DING J. Hyperspectral remote sensing image classification based on dense residual three-dimensional convolutional neural network[J]. Multimedia Tools and Appli-cations, 2021, 80(2): 1859-1882. |
[22] | HE M Y, LI B, CHEN H H. Multi-scale 3D deep convo-lutional neural network for hyperspectral image classifica-tion[C]// Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Confe-rence on Image Processing, Beijing, Sep 17-20, 2017. Pisca-taway: IEEE, 2017: 3904-3908. |
[23] | ROY S K, KRISHNA G, DUBEY S R. HybridSN: explo-ring 3-D-2-D CNN feature hierarchy for hyperspectral image classification[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Let-ters, 2020, 17(2): 277-281. |
[1] | ZHANG Lu, LU Tianliang, DU Yanhui. Overview of Facial Deepfake Video Detection Methods [J]. Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology, 2023, 17(1): 1-26. |
[2] | WANG Shichen, HUANG Kai, CHEN Zhigang, ZHANG Wendong. Survey on 3D Human Pose Estimation of Deep Learning [J]. Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology, 2023, 17(1): 74-87. |
[3] | LIANG Jiali, HUA Baojian, LYU Yashuai, SU Zhenyu. Loop Invariant Code Motion Algorithm for Deep Learning Operators [J]. Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology, 2023, 17(1): 127-139. |
[4] | WANG Jianzhe, WU Qin. Salient Object Detection Based on Coordinate Attention Feature Pyramid [J]. Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology, 2023, 17(1): 154-165. |
[5] | ZHANG Xiangping, LIU Jianxun. Overview of Deep Learning-Based Code Representation and Its Applications [J]. Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology, 2022, 16(9): 2011-2029. |
[6] | LI Dongmei, LUO Sisi, ZHANG Xiaoping, XU Fu. Review on Named Entity Recognition [J]. Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology, 2022, 16(9): 1954-1968. |
[7] | REN Ning, FU Yan, WU Yanxia, LIANG Pengju, HAN Xi. Review of Research on Imbalance Problem in Deep Learning Applied to Object Detection [J]. Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology, 2022, 16(9): 1933-1953. |
[8] | YANG Caidong, LI Chengyang, LI Zhongbo, XIE Yongqiang, SUN Fangwei, QI Jin. Review of Image Super-resolution Reconstruction Algorithms Based on Deep Learning [J]. Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology, 2022, 16(9): 1990-2010. |
[9] | LYU Xiaoqi, JI Ke, CHEN Zhenxiang, SUN Runyuan, MA Kun, WU Jun, LI Yidong. Expert Recommendation Algorithm Combining Attention and Recurrent Neural Network [J]. Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology, 2022, 16(9): 2068-2077. |
[10] | AN Fengping, LI Xiaowei, CAO Xiang. Medical Image Classification Algorithm Based on Weight Initialization-Sliding Window CNN [J]. Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology, 2022, 16(8): 1885-1897. |
[11] | ZENG Fanzhi, XU Luqian, ZHOU Yan, ZHOU Yuexia, LIAO Junwei. Review of Knowledge Tracing Model for Intelligent Education [J]. Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology, 2022, 16(8): 1742-1763. |
[12] | LIU Yi, LI Mengmeng, ZHENG Qibin, QIN Wei, REN Xiaoguang. Survey on Video Object Tracking Algorithms [J]. Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology, 2022, 16(7): 1504-1515. |
[13] | ZHAO Xiaoming, YANG Yijiao, ZHANG Shiqing. Survey of Deep Learning Based Multimodal Emotion Recognition [J]. Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology, 2022, 16(7): 1479-1503. |
[14] | XIA Hongbin, XIAO Yifei, LIU Yuan. Long Text Generation Adversarial Network Model with Self-Attention Mechanism [J]. Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology, 2022, 16(7): 1603-1610. |
[15] | SUN Fangwei, LI Chengyang, XIE Yongqiang, LI Zhongbo, YANG Caidong, QI Jin. Review of Deep Learning Applied to Occluded Object Detection [J]. Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology, 2022, 16(6): 1243-1259. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
/D:/magtech/JO/Jwk3_kxyts/WEB-INF/classes/